our thought on delivering innovative projects. Designing, managing and delivering complex technical projects is a challenge. With technology evolving rapidly, this challenge promises to only increase. However, this is not a new problem. We have always had to evaluate the value of specific technologies to help in the telling of a story. Existing technologies need to be adapted, and often created anew, in order to deliver the most compelling user experience. New solutions on the market need to be
carefully vetted for their viability and longevity for specific projects and clients. Cultural institutions, for example, need the confidence of long-term stability, and operational simplicity. They are often wary (rightfully) of cutting-edge technologies.
Many institutions do not have the dependable in-house expertise to take ownership of innovative technologies and systems. Our experts understand the nuances of the different systems
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.
components, and how they should be implemented to minimize operational challenges and deterioration. And there always needs to be a Plan-B, to revert to in case of technologies being absorbed and removed from the m arket, technologies failing to deliver on their promise, or licensing and deployment models changing.